“After playing God for six years with the world he created, he couldn’t control any of his subjects, none at all. Over the years, he had watched them evolve and become the sum of their own choices rather than the sum of his; and for that, he regretted ever giving them life.” ~Prologue, Socialpunk
Monica Leonelle’s novel Socialpunk opens with that glimpse into the Researcher’s thoughts—and our introduction to our heroine, Ima. She’s a shy girl with an abusive father, absent mother, and a best friend whom Ima wishes would be more than just a friend. When Dash helps Ima sneak away from her father to attend a concert with him, an explosion literally turns Ima’s world upside down.
Ima finds herself in a completely new reality, dealing with a thousand questions as she tries to save Dash—and her new friend Nahum—before it’s too late. To do so, Ima must overcome her shyness and use strengths she didn’t even know she had. She must learn to trust her new friends and convince them to trust her. Yet her reunion with Dash only brings her more questions—and a face-to-face meeting with the Researcher.
Socialpunk reminded me of Sigmund Brouwer’s futuristic suspense novels Broken Angel and Flight of Shadows. Both are set in an America drastically changed by natural disasters and wars. Socialpunk also involved competing realities—and computer-generated super abilities—like The Matrix movies. It was a fast, suspenseful read that kept me rooting for Ima as she struggled to overcome each new hurdle she encountered.
While I found myself thoroughly enjoying the story in Socialpunk, the novel felt “self-published” to me. I’m used to encountering spelling and grammar mistakes even in books from big-name publishers (Deloume Road had one misspelled word and By Faith, Not By Sight had two), but I lost count of the typos in Socialpunk. For me, it distracted from the story.
I also disliked the ending. Socialpunk is the first book in a trilogy, so I didn’t expect everything would be resolved with the end of this book. However, I didn’t expect it to feel as wide open as it did. There was no resolution at all. I wanted some wrap-up with the first book, with some questions left to propel me into the second book. Instead, the book ended on a line that seemed completely unnecessary to me (interesting, but not critical to the plot).
You can find out more about Monica and her books by visiting her website. You can sign up for email updates from Monica and receive two of her ebooks, including Socialpunk, for free!
Come back on Tuesday for my interview with Monica to find out what she has to say about marketing books and writing futuristic fiction!
I received this book for review courtesy of Monica; all opinions expressed are my own. This post contains affiliate links; as an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
14 Comments
I’m torn. To read or not to read. Hmmm??
twitted this today, Socialpunk from Monica Leonelle
twitted this today, Brand New iPad 3
twitted this today
Well, it’s interesting to see how many other readers also dislike typos. I thought it was just me being a picky editor type. 🙂
Interesting beginning.
Re: typos, etc. I can forgive a couple but any more than that and it takes away from any enjoyment of the book. Sorry that was the case here.
The Prologue is certainly intriguing!
Thanks for linking your post on Book Beginnings! I am glad to find your blog. I’ll sign up as a follower as soon as I finish this comment.
This would not be a book for me but great to see what others are reading. Thanks for visiting.
fiction-books – I’m sorry it sounded like I didn’t enjoy Socialpunks. I did! It was a fast, fun read and I am curious about what will happen in the next few books.
Because I’m a writer and editor myself, I’m likely harder on other authors about typos and grammatical mistakes. As I mentioned, nearly every book I’ve read lately has had at least one error somewhere in it. I’m actually reading another eBook right now, by a big-name author at a big-name publishing house, that is also driving me crazy with the typos (one that was not only distracting but also created an issue in understanding the material being discussed).
Lesson to all of us writers – edit and proofread! And if you aren’t good at that yourself, find someone else who is. (Like me!) 🙂
I kind of like the prologue’s beginning but I see your point about the self-published feel. Nothing puts you off more than those typos and other mistakes that could be avoided so easily.
I’m not a big fan of mistakes at all…I get turned off when a book is filled with them.
I get frustrated with spelling errors in books as well! Too bad it distracts from the reading experience!
I really cringe at errors in spelling and grammar….otherwise, the opening seems intriguing.
Thanks for visiting my blog.
Hi Bonnie,
This isn’t my kind of book at all, but I can still sympathise with you not enjoying it too much.
I don’t like books whch leave the reader ‘up in the air’ when they are finished, even if they are part of a series. It feels like you are being held to ransom by the author and have to read the rest of the series if you want to know how it all ends. If you decide not to read any more books, you then feel like you have wasted your time on this one!
I also agree with you about authors who release books into the marketplace, with a plethora of spelling mistakes and grammatical errors. I have even had authors assure me that their book has been proof read and edited professionally and yet still it is full of mistakes.
The same goes for authors who convert their files to a download option, then don’t take the trouble to check that it actually works on all readers. I have had a couple of review copies just lately, which are a real challenge to read because of the formatting issues.
Whinge over!!! I do loev those opening first lines. If there is a God, he must be looking down on us all now and wondering exactly where he went so horribly wrong!!
Have a good weekend,
Yvonne (One of my nicknames at school, was ‘Bonnie’, no idea why!)